![]() But I am unhappy because I do not see why. Which is OK with a immutable reference but not a value. ![]() ![]() I am happy, I learnt of Option::as_ref and I see what it does, unwrap returns what ever is in the option transferring ownership. On the LHS c is immutable so why does it not do a immutable borrow? What prevents it doing that? What is the reason for it? I do not see why unwrap needs to take ownership. I see that I only have a borrow of the option field (the &self in the signature of cnt). as_ref() gives you an owned Option that has a ref to the value inside, and you can unwrap that. Unwrap() takes self which means it wants to move/consume it, but you have only a borrow of the Option field. So I've concluded that unwrap is idiomatic in the situation where your program shouldn't ever need to bother with that edge case and it's hard to decipher what exact error message you would write for expect, or you are writing test cases. Ultimate Unwrap 3d Pro Crack Download ((FREE)) I was told by a few people that unwrap is always non-idiomatic in rust, but I've come to a situation in my app where I don't think it's possible to ever hit the case where error handling will ever occur. The matched elements (and their siblings, if any) replace their parents within the DOM structure. unwrap() method removes the element's parent and returns the unwrapped content. Ultimate Unwrap 3d Pro Crack Download ((FREE)) dosidobus DecemUltimate Unwrap 3d Pro Crack Download ((FREE))
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |